The Federal Government, on Wednesday, gave reasons why it has been unable to offset overwhelming judgement debts it accumulated overtime.

It stressed that since 2019, the Federal Ministry of Justice has not received any budgetary allocation for settlement of judgement debts.

The Solicitor-General of the Federation and Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Justice, Mrs. Beatrice Jedy-Agba, made the disclosure at a strategic dialogue on accessing remedies for human rights violation in Nigeria, which was held in Abuja.

She decried that despite available legal framework in the country, the timely prosecution of fundamental right cases and enforcement of the resulting judgements, remained a major challenge for the government.

The SGF said it was unfortunate that FG, through the Justice Ministry, was often compelled to pay judgement debts that emanated from unlawful actions of law enforcement institutions and agents.

“Most often, security or law enforcement agencies are the actual judgement debtors since their actions and inactions occasion the infractions.

“However, the Federal Ministry of Justice is dragged into the arena either because the Attorney-General of the Federation is sued as a nominal party or the judgement creditor approaches the AGF to grant consent, pursuant to the provisions of section 84 (1-3) of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act.

“As a matter of due process and FGN Financial Regulations, if is the policy of the Federal Ministry of Finance that payment of judgement debt by any agency must be based on clearance by the Attorney-General and requisite budgetary appropriation.

“Some of the debtor agencies do refer judgement debts to the Attorney-General for intervention. The Ministry itself is handicapped from settling any judgement debt either for itself or on behalf of the Federal Government or its agencies die to paucity of funds.

“For instance, the Ministry has not received any budgetary allocation for settlement of judgement debts since 2019.

“Thus, the Ministry always demand that defaulting agencies either comply or appeal such judgements.

“The scheme of issuance of promissory notes that was designed to bridge the gap of lack of funds occasioned by revenue shortfalls also comes with its own challenges.

“One of such process of issuing promissory notes which was commenced over three years ago, is yet to be concluded due to interval bureaucracy and same is now stucked at the National Assembly,” the SGF stated.

She said there was need for greater synergy between the Justice Ministry, National Human Rights Commission and other critical stakeholders in order to increase access to remedies outside the conventional court system as witnessed in the payment of compensation to victims of the September 20, 2013 joint security raid in the Apo Legislative District in Abuja, which led to loss of lives, as well as victims of right violations by SARS.

On his part, the Executive Secretary of the NHRC, Mr. Tony Ojukwu, SAN, said the Commission would in line with its mandate, continue to hold the government and its agencies accountable.

He maintained that under the NHRC Act, decisions of the Commission are at par with high court judgements.

Meanwhile, in his remarks, frontline human rights activist, Mr. Femi Falana, SAN, said Nigerians must always stand up to defend their rights and demand strict adherence to the principles of the rule of law.

He bemoaned that despite the existence of many legislations and legal instruments that Nigeria ratified, cases of rights violations have continued to be on the increase.·

The Federal Government, on Wednesday, gave reasons why it has been unable to offset overwhelming judgement debts it accumulated overtime.

It stressed that since 2019, the Federal Ministry of Justice has not received any budgetary allocation for settlement of judgement debts.

The Solicitor-General of the Federation and Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Justice, Mrs. Beatrice Jedy-Agba, made the disclosure at a strategic dialogue on accessing remedies for human rights violation in Nigeria, which was held in Abuja.

She decried that despite available legal framework in the country, the timely prosecution of fundamental right cases and enforcement of the resulting judgements, remained a major challenge for the government.

The SGF said it was unfortunate that FG, through the Justice Ministry, was often compelled to pay judgement debts that emanated from unlawful actions of law enforcement institutions and agents.

“Most often, security or law enforcement agencies are the actual judgement debtors since their actions and inactions occasion the infractions.

“However, the Federal Ministry of Justice is dragged into the arena either because the Attorney-General of the Federation is sued as a nominal party or the judgement creditor approaches the AGF to grant consent, pursuant to the provisions of section 84 (1-3) of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act.

“As a matter of due process and FGN Financial Regulations, if is the policy of the Federal Ministry of Finance that payment of judgement debt by any agency must be based on clearance by the Attorney-General and requisite budgetary appropriation.

“Some of the debtor agencies do refer judgement debts to the Attorney-General for intervention. The Ministry itself is handicapped from settling any judgement debt either for itself or on behalf of the Federal Government or its agencies die to paucity of funds.

“For instance, the Ministry has not received any budgetary allocation for settlement of judgement debts since 2019.

“Thus, the Ministry always demand that defaulting agencies either comply or appeal such judgements.

“The scheme of issuance of promissory notes that was designed to bridge the gap of lack of funds occasioned by revenue shortfalls also comes with its own challenges.

“One of such process of issuing promissory notes which was commenced over three years ago, is yet to be concluded due to interval bureaucracy and same is now stucked at the National Assembly,” the SGF stated.

She said there was need for greater synergy between the Justice Ministry, National Human Rights Commission and other critical stakeholders in order to increase access to remedies outside the conventional court system as witnessed in the payment of compensation to victims of the September 20, 2013 joint security raid in the Apo Legislative District in Abuja, which led to loss of lives, as well as victims of right violations by SARS.

On his part, the Executive Secretary of the NHRC, Mr. Tony Ojukwu, SAN, said the Commission would in line with its mandate, continue to hold the government and its agencies accountable.

He maintained that under the NHRC Act, decisions of the Commission are at par with high court judgements.

Meanwhile, in his remarks, frontline human rights activist, Mr. Femi Falana, SAN, said Nigerians must always stand up to defend their rights and demand strict adherence to the principles of the rule of law.

He bemoaned that despite the existence of many legislations and legal instruments that Nigeria ratified, cases of rights violations have continued to be on the increase.·